Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2024 07:39:09 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: David Chisnall <theraven@freebsd.org> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, Kristof Provost <kp@freebsd.org>, Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org>, Dmitry Salychev <dsl@freebsd.org>, Jan Knepper <jan@digitaldaemon.com>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: The Case for Rust (in any system) Message-ID: <202409090739.4897d92v078621@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <202DD893-B152-4B38-AE9B-862E08785396@freebsd.org> References: <202409082111.488LBTtI074660@critter.freebsd.dk> <202DD893-B152-4B38-AE9B-862E08785396@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-------- David Chisnall writes: > On 8 Sep 2024, at 22:11, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > > The logical progression of C++ adoption would start with using a C++ > > compiler as a better C compiler. > > Compiling C as C++ will *normally* give the same output, but not always. But do you agree that the C++ compiler's take on things make more sense than the C compiler's in these cases ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?202409090739.4897d92v078621>