Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 09 May 2014 12:48:18 +0900
From:      Kaho Toshikazu <kaho@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
To:        Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Centrino Wireless-N 1000 support is also broken (Re: iwn(4) in -HEAD supporting Centrino Wireless-N 135)
Message-ID:  <20396.1399607298@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
References:  <CAJ-Vmo=y77Eh9CCevN4cAWn23SZ1cG=gCq9YMPeJ4xeP6j77Gw@mail.gmail.com> <20140226123709.GA31099@syn.pertho.net> <CAJ-Vmom=b5tPTh1qWNG=zV5qM=Wzf1BRe5%2B2-ndrR648NSFmkw@mail.gmail.com> <530EE7F4.3080903@shurik.kiev.ua> <CAJ-VmomsEdS5nm8rX6245rAEhVxWeOc4aO9AYrmEBHuUKHG=Tw@mail.gmail.com> <24791.1393550277@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp> <CAJ-Vmo=wZyMM1uWTyFV=Yb3vd=EmfiW_NY5Vp1c-JmV5hF2ENA@mail.gmail.com> <75498.1398751548@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp> <CAJ-VmokVPA0rQSwins3NuppV%2B2ypYLCTF0nFGeU828GLpPp2KQ@mail.gmail.com> <84650.1398819225@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp> <CAJ-Vmo=0t%2BzoJ0HwArHkQnpBbHas5WiKj%2Be9y_T3SFsFsuiewA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmomHvEqJQ-2C9hr4TRD%2BG-a-LgYSG2Z_ESDM-_ndRE4LFA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmo=tv3-LkU5WJENFedK5EqtRDxUsbQAK=rin_zDZiOZfSQ@mail.gmail.com> <14909.1399545008@elam.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp> <CAJ-VmoktP6GnMY4YYx=x3DmSrSK7tUGmy%2Bd=VObRCdFAHxFmTw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
  Hello, 

Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote:

> So what's the value of txchainmask and rxchainmask from the EEPROM?
> before things get overridden?
> 
> I'd like to figure out what that changed.

In both before and after applying the patch, sc->txchainmask=1,
sc->rxchainmask=3, ntxsteams=1. I think that 1st breakage
introduced by r258030 in the function iwn_set_link_quality()
was already fixed by r258085.

2nd breakage introduced by r258035 seems to be fixed by the patch.
Because 2nd breakage was introduced before 1st breakage was fixed,
we faced to a difficulty tracking down the problem. 
I don't know a meaning of a parameter .calib_need,
but it is something wrong and it is corrected by the patch.

-- 
Kaho Toshikazu





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20396.1399607298>