Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 21:22:05 +0100 From: Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org> To: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org> Cc: "David P. Discher" <dpd@dpdtech.com>, freebsd-infiniband@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Request updated/unified patch for OFED v3.2 update Message-ID: <207113AF-4D33-4DD6-8A69-DD9ABD48DB8F@postgresql.org> In-Reply-To: <571BC0A6.9070100@selasky.org> References: <AD97190D-7A99-4007-B0F9-6684D39326AC@dpdtech.com> <571B31B6.4070206@selasky.org> <571BC0A6.9070100@selasky.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 23 Apr 2016, at 19:36, Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org> wrote: > On 04/23/16 10:26, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: >> On 04/23/16 01:08, David P. Discher wrote: >>> Hans and Chris - >>>=20 >>> Any chance of getting an updated diff for the OFED 3.2 patches? I >>> love to see if I can reproduce Chris=92s IPOIB performance. I got a >>> couple MT25208 InfiniHost III Ex I=92d like to start using. >>>=20 >>> I grabbed the D5790-9 freebsd reviews diffs, and attempted to = applied >>> to -head at r298494 : >>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >> Yes, I'll update the patchset later today. It is broken because of = some >> changes I pushed upstream. >>=20 >> --HPS >=20 > Hi, >=20 > You'll need to refetch D5790, D5791 and D5797. Let me know if = something still doesn't apply cleanly. For the archives, which revision is that against? :) + Justin -- "My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the first group; there was less competition there." - Indira Gandhi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?207113AF-4D33-4DD6-8A69-DD9ABD48DB8F>