Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:28:32 +0200 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Barney Wolff <barney@databus.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CVSUP and 5.2.1 RELEASE Message-ID: <22138.1089743312@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 13 Jul 2004 14:23:51 EDT." <20040713182351.GA72492@pit.databus.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20040713182351.GA72492@pit.databus.com>, Barney Wolff writes: >On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 01:05:45PM -0500, Jason Dusek wrote: >> >> I ran make world this morning. I ran make kernel as well, but the kernel is >> broken, so I kept my old kernel. Does this mean that I have a RELEASE >> kernel but a CURRENT world? Am I headed for trouble? > >To core: >How many users do we have to sabotage with "make world" before it gets >removed from the make targets? Is it really that hard in the very rare >case when "make buildworld && make installworld" is what's wanted to >type exactly that? And your argument here is that people are reciprocally less likely to hose (or as it may be: not hose) their systems because the have to type 27 characters more to do so ? Come again... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?22138.1089743312>