Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 07:19:52 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PATCH for testing Message-ID: <23514.942733192@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 15 Nov 1999 14:18:24 PST." <199911152218.OAA45512@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199911152218.OAA45512@apollo.backplane.com>, Matthew Dillon writes: >:http://phk.freebsd.dk/misc/p_args.patch >: >:The p_args.patch patch implements a cache of the commandline arguments >:in the process structure and makes ps(1) pick it up from there with >:sysctl rather than by groping around in the target process memory. >: >:This patch: >: Speeds up ps(1). > > Why don't we get rid of the 'e' option to ps while we are at it > considering how much of a security hole it is. I've never liked the > 'e' option. Hmm, well, I like to have it around for root at least... -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?23514.942733192>