Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 05 Dec 2017 22:43:56 +0000
From:      "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To:        Gordon Tetlow <gordon@tetlows.org>
Cc:        Dewayne Geraghty <dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: http subversion URLs should be discontinued in favor of https URLs
Message-ID:  <24153.1512513836@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: <20171205220849.GH9701@gmail.com>
References:  <97f76231-dace-10c4-cab2-08e5e0d792b5@rawbw.com> <5A2709F6.8030106@grosbein.net> <11532fe7-024d-ba14-0daf-b97282265ec6@rawbw.com> <8788fb0d-4ee9-968a-1e33-e3bd84ffb892@heuristicsystems.com.au> <20171205220849.GH9701@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--------
In message <20171205220849.GH9701@gmail.com>, Gordon Tetlow writes:

>Using this as a reason to not move to HTTPS is a fallacy. We should do
>everything we can to help our end-users get FreeBSD in the most secure
>way.

The vastly oversold "security" of HTTPS is entirely borrowed from
a confederation of root-CA's which no non-deluded person can ever
seriously trust.

Only if you trust *everybody* on this list, is HTTPS "secure":

	grep '^ *Subject:' /usr/local/share/certs/ca-root-nss.crt

And as if that delusion wasn't bad enough, the misguided and
simple-minded IT-liberalistic "Encrypt everything" campaign is,
100% as predicted, pushing governments to neuter encryption in
order to keep the court systems working.

"IETF and what army?"

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?24153.1512513836>