Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2018 11:21:07 +0100 From: Per Hedeland <per@hedeland.org> To: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org" <emulation@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Instant crash starting VBox on 12.0-Stable Message-ID: <24b03c02-d7d0-6344-c26c-8e6a5eadc179@hedeland.org> In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1sF3ZnJL96rKhfQidDCXDuixwH1AWcAB48O2=d4kSfvGg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAN6yY1saUuMhXDxDoW1TnOakWhGM5J_EyHjx1KVn5KrOsXW9xA@mail.gmail.com> <CAN6yY1sUvQU-uJEGDTgK-nbPvqhbbYzqNS%2Bhc6=wTjb5B2Mm5A@mail.gmail.com> <401db2b8-9831-7419-a675-357e41bf24f9@hedeland.org> <CAN6yY1sF3ZnJL96rKhfQidDCXDuixwH1AWcAB48O2=d4kSfvGg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2018-12-23 06:13, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 3:58 PM Per Hedeland <per@hedeland.org <mailto:per@hedeland.org>> wrote:
>
> On 2018-12-22 19:19, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> >
> > Can anyone confirm running VirtualBox on head after 11.0-Release?
>
> Apparently you meant to ask "after 12.0-RELEASE", though I'm not sure
> about the "after" - anyway *on* 12.0-RELEASE, I'm running
> virtualbox-ose-5.2.18_1 (from package) with
> virtualbox-ose-kmod-5.2.22_1 (from port) without problems. Pretty
> light usage though, a single VM running Linux, started "directly" with
> "VirtualBox --startvm xxx" and only access via ssh. Starting the
> "manager application" i.e. plain "VirtualBox", works fine too, though.
>
> But, I'm not loading any vboxnet* modules (seems to be more than one
> these days), only vboxdrv - and that via kld_list in rc.conf, i.e. I
> have no vbox* variables set there. After fighting with the networking
> setup (in more complex cases, that I don't currently use) with first
> vmware and then qemu I decided to do as little as possible of that
> with VirtualBox itself - only bridge to a tapN device, and do the rest
> ("actual" bridging/routing) with the standard FreeBSD functionality.
>
> --Per Hedeland
>
>
> No, I actually meant "be4fore", but I guess it depends on your point of view.. The issue was first reported on RC2, and I have now tested to before the branch of 12 from head. I am about to test on
> head from August. It has worked on 11.2 all the way through Dec. 17, so it is something that changed some time ago. Your experience tells me that, as I had suspected, that the issue is with the
> network module which you do not use. So I am just hoping that someone who was testing head and used VirtualBox with networking.
Well, I do use "VirtualBox with networking" - as I wrote, bridged to a
tapN device, which doesn't require the vboxnet* modules. (I then, with
a bit of overkill for this setup, have created a standard FreeBSD
"bridge" interface to which I "addm" both the tapN (via a devd action)
and my physical ethernet interface.) I am not aware of any
functionality that the "builtin" VirtualBox networking provides that I
can't achieve without it. But of course if you are specifically
interested in using it, I don't have any relevant info.
--Per
> Thanks for the report. It certainly help a bit. Now to boot the August 2018 kernel and see what happens.
> --
> Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
> E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com <mailto:rkoberman@gmail.com>
> PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?24b03c02-d7d0-6344-c26c-8e6a5eadc179>