Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:34:04 -0700 From: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel level virtualisation requirements. Message-ID: <2849CFD3-A747-4202-B2CB-759D3783C0B2@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <47107996.5090607@elischer.org> References: <470E5BFB.4050903@elischer.org> <470FD0DC.5080503@gritton.org> <20071013004539.R1002@10.0.0.1> <47107996.5090607@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Oct 13, 2007, at 00:53 , Julian Elischer wrote: > Generally, you can run several hundred (or more) virtual jail/ > vimage style machines. xen/vmware uses so much more resources that > you are usually limited to > so number like 20. it is possible in a virtual networking setup to > have a single process > spanning several virtual environments (for example one process with > a socket in each of the child universes). > It is a valid question, but there is I think a place for both types of > partitioning. I'll take anything that can *reliably* allow me to run RELENG_5,6,7 (and possibly HEAD) on the same (reasonably) beefy machine. Bonus points for being able to do /i386 on /amd64 (or vice versa). Right now, the only solution that comes even close to doing this is vmware on Windows XP. Bleh. -aDe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2849CFD3-A747-4202-B2CB-759D3783C0B2>