Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:41:26 -0400
From:      Michael Johnson <ahze@ahze.net>
To:        Adam Weinberger <adamw@magnesium.net>
Cc:        freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org, jannisan@t-online.de
Subject:   Re: Port upgrade: www/firefox. Added GUI selection support
Message-ID:  <28921A19-8ED3-4DC3-92B2-DB68720D5DC8@ahze.net>
In-Reply-To: <42B09108.6020208@magnesium.net>
References:  <E1DiSSt-00032x-8Z@rochel.dyndns.org> <42AFE0C9.30201@pacific.net.sg> <op.sselu5wf9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <42AFF04D.7090506@pacific.net.sg> <op.sseouu0o9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <42AFFDA0.5080007@pacific.net.sg> <op.ssfcaeqm9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <2DB082C3-FA38-4DDC-889E-228D29B42C5C@ahze.net> <42B09108.6020208@magnesium.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Jun 15, 2005, at 4:35 PM, Adam Weinberger wrote:

> Michael Johnson wrote:
>
>> On Jun 15, 2005, at 2:28 PM, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 05:06:24 -0500, Erich Dollansky   
>>> <oceanare@pacific.net.sg> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 04:09:33 -0500, Erich Dollansky    
>>>>> <oceanare@pacific.net.sg> wrote:
>>>>>  That's reason why we should kill GTK1, because of no support  
>>>>> and  no  maintain for years. Avoid the world to have full of  
>>>>> worms &  co. from it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> So, you say we should continue to give the poor people here our   
>>>> old machines with Windows as this allows at least browsing with   
>>>> Internet Explorer?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>> on OLDER versions of windows. you could always download an older   
>> version of freebsd and run an older version of firefox.
>>
>>> Uh? Aren't we talking about FreeBSD?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> 3) Use the different browser.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is what we currently do, but it ain't no FreeBSD browser.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Please, there have plenty of different browser for Linux/ 
>>> FreeBSD.  lynx, link, dillo, opera, and goes on...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Erich
>>>>
>
> This discussion is getting silly. Someone needs to make a decision,  
> and someone needs to commit it. I'm on vacation, so I'm not  
> committing right now, but I will make a decision about this (follow  
> it as you wish):
>
> * gtk12 support will *not* be added. We don't build gtk12 support  
> into other apps, and we won't here.
>
> * Xlib/no-XUL support *will* be added. This should give people a  
> nice option for slower machines who don't want to be bogged down by  
> a GTK2 dependency. Note, however, that the FreeBSD GNOME team all  
> uses GTK2, so  the Xlib-only option won't get much committer  
> testing in all likelihood.

This isn't posable according to jannisan, he said Xlib/no-XUL support  
was removed in latest version of firefox so we're back at square 1  
again.

>
> Mezz, ahze, do either of you want to commit this?
>
> # Adam
>
>
> -- 
> Adam Weinberger
> adamw@magnesium.net || adamw@FreeBSD.org
> adamw@vectors.cx    ||   adamw@gnome.org
> http://www.vectors.cx
>




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?28921A19-8ED3-4DC3-92B2-DB68720D5DC8>