Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:33:40 -0500
From:      Kyle Evans <kevans@FreeBSD.org>
To:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: wireguard confusion
Message-ID:  <29044f1d-f835-459d-8e1c-17832580b5d9@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <uhVHXogbBovqSApS@aceecat.org>
References:  <uhVHXogbBovqSApS@aceecat.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/7/24 20:13, fatty.merchandise677@aceecat.org wrote:
> There is a wireguard package which contains the wg tool and a helpful
> rc.conf bit.  But there is *also* a /usr/bin/wg in base (as of 14.1)
> and as far as I can tell it is the same version (though not identical
> bit by bit). What is going on here?
> 

We imported wg(8), but left wireguard-tools intact in ports because we 
don't have a good replacement for wg-quick(8) and the rc script at the 
moment -- the former has a bash requirement.  I'd love to have more 
direct equivalents in base, but it seems that nobody's interested in a 
wg-quick analog.

Thanks,

Kyle Evans



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?29044f1d-f835-459d-8e1c-17832580b5d9>