Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 00:25:54 +0100 From: Heino Tiedemann <rotkaps_spam_trap@gmx.de> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox 4 - Beta Message-ID: <296d58-3fm2.ln1@news.hansenet.de> References: <rhk948-1bv1.ln1@news.hansenet.de> <AANLkTi=WmhP_=4p_i2Fu6qgKMZh3h3S-4%2BNgPbgjRd=0@mail.gmail.com> <3s9c58-nq7.ln1@news.hansenet.de> <AANLkTikEr77o5Z4fybmi6Dc_MdYZ3ypX15nZ823iseMG@mail.gmail.com> <im0hjr$blp$1@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) wrote: > Edwin L. Culp W. <edwinlculp@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > I installed the ReleaseCandidate1 from firefox-devel. Is thery any >> > change in since the move from firefox-devel to www/firefox, that I >> > should rebuild the RC1? >> >> I would assume not because, I ereased firefox-devel from ports a few >> hours ago and updated www/firefox from svn asmentioned above and got >> the same version that I had in firefox-devel. > > Revision 522 has now switched to firefox-4.0.source.tar.bz2. > > ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/nightly/4.0-candidates/build1/source/firefox-4.0.source.tar.bz2 Yes, I got that and rebuilded. > However, the _only_ difference is the addition of a FIREFOX_4_0_RELEASE > tag to .hgtags. So don't bother rebuilding. One more difference is: It calles itself not loger Release Candidate: Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0 Heino
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?296d58-3fm2.ln1>