Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 12:20:58 +0100 From: Dave <ffmpeg@dgmm.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A request to segregate man pages for shell built-ins Message-ID: <2998073.ZJssjdD8cR@amd.asgard.uk> In-Reply-To: <VI1PR02MB12005A16022101E37C9C4D00F6440@VI1PR02MB1200.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> References: <VI1PR02MB1200817E0E2CDD2A2A42E1A5F6440@VI1PR02MB1200.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> <15f52853ee8.2787.c09309b3b9b6c7ba483efefa0c51d672@rail.eu.org> <VI1PR02MB12005A16022101E37C9C4D00F6440@VI1PR02MB1200.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 25 October 2017 08:03:03 Manish Jain wrote: > > On 10/25/17 13:23, Erwan DAVID wrote: > > That would mean doing a new section per shell eg (1bash) (1csh) (1zsh) > > each shell has its own builtins, Hicham can differ (compare set in bash > > and csh ) > > Perhaps a new, unique section of man pages (something like section 99) > implemented for sh only and which can be called by any shell with the > same syntax : 'man 99 set' Does man allow for multiple arguments and does the man page structure allow for book marks? eg man bash echo could display the bash man page at the echo command.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2998073.ZJssjdD8cR>