Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:25:46 +0000 From: "Pieper, Jeffrey E" <jeffrey.e.pieper@intel.com> To: Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: TSO test Message-ID: <2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D656880953A88@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <CAFOYbcn9XTaLrtZhkS1X69qhf2aOe0iOSirCTA=LfGsZDTqbeg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAFOYbcn9XTaLrtZhkS1X69qhf2aOe0iOSirCTA=LfGsZDTqbeg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Basically what we do is run TCP tx traffic using various message sizes with= TSO enabled, while logging throughput and CPU usage, then run the same sce= nario again with TSO disabled. We do this with both IPv4 and IPv6. Jeff -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org] = On Behalf Of Jack Vogel Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 11:31 PM To: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: TSO test Anyone have a 'simple' test case for TSO, something a bit more distilled than running netperf or iperf? Thanks, Jack _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D656880953A88>