Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:11:40 +0200 From: Remko Lodder <remko@elvandar.org> To: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Wordpress outputs an empty page after ports upgrade Message-ID: <2BF3C2F7-314C-432A-86E6-D743E5FBF983@elvandar.org> In-Reply-To: <4C45E262.40702@rawbw.com> References: <4C4416A7.3060308@rawbw.com> <A7B70092-48B6-4DBD-B0B4-86B2C03F8892@elvandar.org> <4C45E262.40702@rawbw.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jul 20, 2010, at 7:52 PM, Yuri wrote: > On 07/20/2010 10:45, Remko Lodder wrote: >> Somehow I get the feeling that you do not understand Volunteer = projects and that you are not >> thankfull for the hours people spend on software for YOU. >> =20 >=20 > Remko, >=20 > What makes you think that I "do not understand Volunteer projects" and = "not thankfull for the hours people spend"? >=20 > I just reported the issue with the maintainer's e-mail. Since I don't = have the commit privileges the only thing I can do aboutn this is to = report it to ports@. Am I wrong? Not about the mentioned parts. But you are about: "Please make sure there is the valid maintainer e-email specified for = wordpress." Without context and the like (should I mention that the original report = to the maintainer's email address is "lacking information" ?) you seem = to have this against the entire Ports Community. That can only be resolved if you volunteer = to do the work to make it happen. Else you need to learn to live with it = that sometimes addresses get bogus. Did you consider that the guy might have been taken = out of his email? that ther emight be issues at the provider? That he = might have changed ISP's and didn't change email addresses yet? Or one of the many other = reasons that we can think of? Its like this: You emailed with limited information, to an email address = that is currently not responding. Whether that has it's reasons or not, = or whether that's on purpose is something we cannot comment on and need to see whether this might or = might not is a problem. On the other end: i tested this and his primairy MX seems to refuse = connections, whilst the secondary does not allow relay. That might be a = transient problem. Please wait and see, and file a PR in case this is a real problem for = you. >=20 > Yuri --=20 /"\ Best regards, | remko@FreeBSD.org \ / Remko Lodder | remko@EFnet X http://www.evilcoder.org/ | / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2BF3C2F7-314C-432A-86E6-D743E5FBF983>