Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 01:36:07 -0500 From: Ryan Coleman <ryan.coleman@cwis.biz> To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, Peter Boosten <peter@boosten.org> Subject: Re: OT: Apache as reverse SSL proxy Message-ID: <2C683AF7-AFA5-4D5E-8575-19455EBB142B@cwis.biz> In-Reply-To: <4CAAB89F.70907@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <20101004221506.GA8662@polands.org> <AANLkTinCfhmyb1XVXOk4PiSs-MMRPJ4bjvkb6bYiiODJ@mail.gmail.com> <20101005035354.GB8662@polands.org> <4CAAAC4A.5060106@boosten.org> <4CAAB89F.70907@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Oct 5, 2010, at 12:33 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Nowadays there is also the possibility of RFC2817 -- in essence you > start an ordinary HTTP session, then issue a STARTTLS command and > upgrade the connection to encrypted. This will allow name-based = virtual > hosting with TLS to work as intended. Unfortunately, last I checked, > while apache supports this, most web browsers do not. Throwing just my two bits in: Apache supports it, as does Firefox, and = nothing else (maybe Safari does...). IE definitely does not. I looked into this before opting to go multiple = static IPs at home for my webservers.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2C683AF7-AFA5-4D5E-8575-19455EBB142B>