Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 06:24:57 +0000 From: =?utf-8?Q?Einar_Bjarni_Halld=C3=B3rsson?= <einar@isnic.is> To: Nuno Teixeira <eduardo@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple new R ports Message-ID: <2E6761A6-F462-4B83-94AC-9658583A581D@isnic.is> In-Reply-To: <CAFDf7U%2BG2v5eQ2OJq76d2f3UGht9J1kTstFECAaqqnPPq5QUvA@mail.gmail.com> References: <44F61FC1-532F-447F-80E9-83ED37599CD7@isnic.is> <CALH631nPt94VcQnsh5_CQHnGkb-5uVvRotFGWWoj4wRtNveXUQ@mail.gmail.com> <AD61A7F4-D5CC-487D-A08A-47267FD69052@isnic.is> <16c2bf5c-9022-4ce9-9283-838f99d80ba3@isnic.is> <CAFDf7U%2BG2v5eQ2OJq76d2f3UGht9J1kTstFECAaqqnPPq5QUvA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Nuno, > On 22 Feb 2024, at 11:43, Nuno Teixeira <eduardo@freebsd.org> wrote: >=20 > I did take a look at review and noticed that TEST_DEPENDS are not used > and that could means that test target works without any depends or > ports are not tested at all. > My curiosity is what do you think about the importance (or not) to > have testunit feature working on R ports? >=20 > I maintain a couple R ports and testunit revealed some errors that > upstream fixed. > Maybe this testunit subject could be apply to all ports that have that = feature. >=20 Thanks for the info. I=E2=80=99m going through the ports and making sure = test targets can be run. I=E2=80=99ll update the diff when I=E2=80=99m done. .einar
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2E6761A6-F462-4B83-94AC-9658583A581D>