Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 14:17:54 +0200 From: "Muenz, Michael" <m.muenz@spam-fetish.org> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GRE/gif/netgraph tunnel speed on 10Gbit channel Message-ID: <2d73fb0b-4e2f-d130-de95-88f7b8bf20ae@spam-fetish.org> In-Reply-To: <20180529113304.GA59501@hell.ukr.net> References: <20180529071733.GA18182@hell.ukr.net> <58deda3e-6eda-bade-0461-97014a64182e@yandex.ru> <20180529100544.GA58705@hell.ukr.net> <347581ff-1f32-c8c4-dce8-9c4632f4cd84@yandex.ru> <20180529105853.GA59230@hell.ukr.net> <ead44b3f-5545-3896-90ba-261a1fd4abca@yandex.ru> <20180529113304.GA59501@hell.ukr.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 29.05.2018 um 13:33 schrieb Vitalij Satanivskij: > AVE> > AVE> So, is there no difference at all? The same bit rate with and without > AVE> loaded module? Can you share your configs and parameters used for testing? > > > KERNEL - GENERIC > > No additional config in src.conf make.conf, no sysct.conf or anything else in configs > > 1) no module > > mtu on ixl - 1500 mtu on gre0 - 1476 Can you try MTU 1400 on GRE0 and MSS of 1300 just for testing? With this values I get 4600Mbit sending and 1400Mbit receiving with iperf and 10 parallel streams. Michael
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2d73fb0b-4e2f-d130-de95-88f7b8bf20ae>