Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 09:18:46 +0800 From: "Shaowei Wang (wsw)" <wsw1wsw2@gmail.com> To: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: llvm/clang a tool chain or just a compiler for FreeBSD? Message-ID: <2e566b9e0907211818k1a52ef7am5c681a6f4ffc868c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20090721131735.GA18929@freebsd.org> References: <2e566b9e0907202134h5568a06bl33a8d95ac9c7f845@mail.gmail.com> <20090721131735.GA18929@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:34:29PM +0800, Shaowei Wang (wsw) wrote: > > Hi, hackers! > > > > Recently I am playing the clangbsd i386 branch and it works. I've noticed > > that clang using gcc to linking object code or even doing assembling. > > > > clang from FreeBSD perspective will be a whole compiler tool chain or > just > > another C/C++ compiler (may using system's [GNU]as and [GNU]ld) ? > > llvm people are working on "mc" which is a native assembler/dissasembler. > so the only part of the toolchain missing will be linker... now we > need as/ld (and gnu driver that knows how to talk to them) So what's the direction? Are we going to cut off all the GNU compiler tool chains and use the llvm/clang when it's mature. > > > roman >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2e566b9e0907211818k1a52ef7am5c681a6f4ffc868c>