Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 13:41:59 -0600 From: Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> To: Ruslan Makhmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org, Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> Subject: Re: ports/172600: [PKGNG]sysutils/bacula-client & sysutils/bacula-server conflict and shouldn't Message-ID: <2e7805e18374f54e6c2df34d932b855e@webmail.lerctr.org> In-Reply-To: <50E5C7AC.9000802@yandex.ru> References: <201301031245.r03Cj8fm045924@freefall.freebsd.org> <b9ab1d9a6481192685a164a194017da6@webmail.lerctr.org> <50E5AD5D.8020402@yandex.ru> <c11fb13f8825e1dc19ab2af6454e3153@mail.unixathome.org> <50E5C7AC.9000802@yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2013-01-03 12:02, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: > Dan Langille wrote on 03.01.2013 20:37: >> On 2013-01-03 11:10, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: >>> Thank you for quick reply! >>> >>> Larry Rosenman wrote on 03.01.2013 19:52: >>>> ===> Running ldconfig >>>> /sbin/ldconfig -m /usr/local/lib >>>> ===> Registering installation for bacula-client-5.2.12 >>>> Installing bacula-client-5.2.12...pkg: bacula-client-5.2.12 >>>> conflicts >>>> with bacula-server-5.2.12 (installs files into the same place). >>>> Problematic file: /usr/local/man/man8/bacula-fd.8.gz >>> >>> It's quite odd, because this file is installed only if >>> WITH_CLIENT_ONLY is enabled. Can't it be some pkg cached result or >>> something? Would you please try to set PORTREVISION to 1 in >>> bacula-server/Makefile and try again? If this helps, >> >> Larry: FYI: bacula-server now installs bacula-client as a >> LIB_DEPENDS >> >> Thus, after installing bacula-server, bacula-client should already >> be >> installed. >> >> Does that help? > > Maybe they need to be deinstalled first? Deinstall/re-install (and making sure all the /usr/local/lib/libbac* stuff is deleted, etc) seems to work. /usr/local/etc/rc.d/bacula-sd has an extraneous rcvar=`set_rcvar` line in it that should be nuked. Thanks guys! > >> Ahh, yes, we did not bump the PORTREVISION. I think we should have. >> Let >> me know >> if a bump helps. >> >>>> Yes, it still seems to be broken, there is a pending PR to fix >>>> it, but >>>> AFAIK it has NOT been committed yet. >>> >>> This one, that I closed today? >>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=170773 >> >> No, this PR committed in Dec: >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/167700 >> >>> I believe it's no more applicable to current port state and >>> something >>> similar is done in current bacula ports anyway. >> >> I do not understand the above statement. > > Forget it :). I mean something like "this particular patch (from pr I > mentioned) will not apply against current ports tree". And the second > part - the current bacula ports should be ok by themselves, and no > modification like in that pr is needed anymore. But it's strange that > it still failing with pkgng.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2e7805e18374f54e6c2df34d932b855e>