Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 10:06:29 -0700 From: Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org> To: Andre Albsmeier <andre@fbsd.e4m.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r459266 - in head/sysutils/devcpu-data: . files Message-ID: <2f342782-b5e2-e424-40ba-19b63532675f@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20180118170358.GA11507@voyager> References: <201801171604.w0HG4Swh054032@repo.freebsd.org> <20180118170358.GA11507@voyager>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --dBO3sT7uHO8yyk8RWDr2eFLdOvO7IifNK Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="1TbE0ascFPrGHmbt9Zx5TmpLW7sxE2CYQ"; protected-headers="v1" From: Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org> To: Andre Albsmeier <andre@fbsd.e4m.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Message-ID: <2f342782-b5e2-e424-40ba-19b63532675f@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r459266 - in head/sysutils/devcpu-data: . files References: <201801171604.w0HG4Swh054032@repo.freebsd.org> <20180118170358.GA11507@voyager> In-Reply-To: <20180118170358.GA11507@voyager> --1TbE0ascFPrGHmbt9Zx5TmpLW7sxE2CYQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01/18/18 10:03, Andre Albsmeier wrote: > On Wed, 17-Jan-2018 at 16:04:28 +0000, Sean Bruno wrote: >> Author: sbruno >> Date: Wed Jan 17 16:04:27 2018 >> New Revision: 459266 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/459266 >> >> Log: >> sysutils/devcpu-data: Migrate our microcode update on Intel to use p= recreated files. >> =20 >> Intel provides prefabricated per-cpu microcode update files. We no = longer need >> a tool to extract them from the legacy microcode.dat store. This ma= tches >> what upstream linux distributions are doing now. Tested on my Intel= machines >=20 > Hmm, the old mechanism gave me 169 files while this new one gives > me only 99. On the other hand, the file >=20 > -rw-r----- 1 andre andre 6144 18 Jan 17:40 0f-02-07 >=20 > from the new one, is the concatenation of >=20 > -rw-r----- 1 andre andre 2048 18 Jan 17:41 m02f2738.fw > -rw-r----- 1 andre andre 2048 18 Jan 17:41 m04f2737.fw > -rw-r----- 1 andre andre 2048 18 Jan 17:42 m08f2739.fw >=20 > from the old one (there are more files like this). However, I wonder > if feeding cpucontrol with 0f-02-07 on a machine which formerly had > been patched using m04f2737.fw will still work. >=20 That's the general idea, yes. We did a quick audit in the review and it seems to be that way. sean --1TbE0ascFPrGHmbt9Zx5TmpLW7sxE2CYQ-- --dBO3sT7uHO8yyk8RWDr2eFLdOvO7IifNK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAEBCgB9FiEE6MTp+IA1BOHj9Lo0veT1/om1/LYFAlpg1BVfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEU4 QzRFOUY4ODAzNTA0RTFFM0Y0QkEzNEJERTRGNUZFODlCNUZDQjYACgkQveT1/om1 /LbbPggAsG101azD3giTDJyb6MsWGPRQtZlncan1SKkuoJWsx4k2/IVRJYfYUndw FVuBFcOmGSdOuRBSckUIjKF/twlY0idVuOL+2nYLiXUfH1lb4wDW13mGp3FzA0ej 8Y69NeyBO7clGugC/d6T2AdxeTgN1CPqEwPaOtixMbsv187Ukd8g0ltgVitB1w6y mfgqGZ+h+hoeK5MkC5R9ikzV4pF1yNxhJykpU97tE8s8qi4PAERPqrsIhngm47hN 2z3BdpF4swpSbXkJFycdDO+EDlRYVUziL64BPwToYc0N9GKAjfKkTLNS+tVtrIld LkSPyb5nJpVFUJ/20HvRcgOGgufpow== =Alou -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dBO3sT7uHO8yyk8RWDr2eFLdOvO7IifNK--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2f342782-b5e2-e424-40ba-19b63532675f>