Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 05 Mar 1997 13:56:57 +0100
From:      Eivind Eklund <eivind@dimaga.com>
To:        Paul Traina <pst@freefall.freebsd.org>
Cc:        cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org, gpalmer@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit:  ports/net/samba/pkg PLIST ports/net/samba Makefile ports/net/samba/files md5 ports/net/samba/patches patch-aa patch-ab
Message-ID:  <3.0.32.19970305135656.015e8e00@dimaga.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 05:35 PM 3/4/97 -0800, Paul Traina wrote:
>pst         97/03/04 17:35:21
>
>  Modified:    net/samba  Makefile
>               net/samba/files  md5
>               net/samba/patches  patch-aa
>               net/samba/pkg  PLIST
>  Removed:     net/samba/patches  patch-ab
>  Log:
>  upgrade to 1.9.16p11
>  
>  Revision  Changes    Path
>  1.12      +2 -2      ports/net/samba/Makefile
>  1.8       +1 -1      ports/net/samba/files/md5
>  1.6       +65 -138   ports/net/samba/patches/patch-aa
>  1.6       +3 -3      ports/net/samba/pkg/PLIST

This port still has a 'version required' line of 1.9.15p8.

There still is a point in smbtar where you are asked to edit to show where
smbclient is located (previous patch-ab); shouldn't we patch it?  Suggested
patch is at freefall:~eivind/samba/patch-ab
Also, your upgrade do not make the difference between superuser scripts and
user scripts; the previous version of the port made this distinction.  This
will make anybody that upgrade have two different versions of the scripts
(old in /usr/local/sbin, new in /usr/local/bin).  A full replacement for
patch-aa is at freefall:~eivind/samba/patch-aa

Gary: I sent you an upgrade for samba from 1.9.15p8 to 1.9.16p11 a little
more than a week ago, asking whether you wanted to commit it, you wanted me
to commit it, or you wanted to commit another upgrade, or there was a
reason for keeping samba at the present (15p8) version.  I didn't even get
a reply.  I assume this is due to time-pressure (I'm a chronic
procastinator myself); would it be an idea to put somebody else as
maintainer?  I can take it, if nescessary - I use samba and track new
versions anyway.


Eivind Eklund perhaps@yes.no http://maybe.yes.no/perhaps/ eivind@freebsd.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.32.19970305135656.015e8e00>