Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 17:19:22 -0400 From: Allen <allen@easytospell.com> To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com>, "Bill Moran" <wmoran@iowna.com>, <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: [OT] Spam from Windriver - how should I react? Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.20010623171922.00db1f18@pop.easytospell.com> In-Reply-To: <000001c0fc20$7ad7f420$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com> References: <3B337E1B.65DBBAAA@iowna.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 01:09 PM 6/23/2001 -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: >All that is required to classify an e-mail transmission as spam The only reason I'm commenting here is because care should be taken when defining spam so that no loop holes are left open and you don't inadvertently leave yourself standing on a slippery slope. The best definition I've seen is: http://www.monkeys.com/spam-defined/ -- Allen C mindsieve.com easytospell.com packetmonkeys.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.5.32.20010623171922.00db1f18>