Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 10:41:28 +0800 From: "Mao Shou Yan" <david.mao@thomson.net> To: "Gleb Smirnoff" <glebius@FreeBSD.org>, <net@FreeBSD.org> Subject: RE: em(4) patch for test Message-ID: <31021C278A7A6B4AB95E9A085C355218284807@bjngsmail01>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Can we patch it against 4.11? If not, can we patch the em_intr() to 4.11?=20 Is this patch useful to 4.11? Thanks! David.Mao -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org = [mailto:owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Gleb Smirnoff Sent: 2005=C4=EA10=D4=C220=C8=D5 22:02 To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: em(4) patch for test Colleagues, since the if_em problem was taken as a late showstopper for = 6.0-RELEASE, I am asking you to help with testing of the fixes made in HEAD. Does your em(4) interface wedge for some time? Do you see a lot of errors in 'netstat -i' output? Does these errors increase not monotonously but they have peaks? If the answer is yes, then the attached patch is likely to fix your = problem. If the answer is no, then you are still encouraged to help with testing and install the patch to check that no regressions are introduced. If = you skip this, then you may encounter regressions after release, so you have been warned. So, in short: please test! Thanks in advance! The patch is against fresh RELENG_6. --=20 Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?31021C278A7A6B4AB95E9A085C355218284807>