Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 07 Jun 96 10:49:00 PDT
From:      "Schwenk, Peter" <pschwenk@wcupa.edu>
To:        "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   RE: Installing FreeBSD-stable
Message-ID:  <31B86E84@spectrum.wcupa.edu>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

What is meant by merging the /etc and /dev files?  I'm beginning to
tackle the -stable issues, and I'm not really sure what is meant by
this.

 - Peter Schwenk, Academic Computing, West Chester University of PA
 - pschwenk@wcupa.edu

 ----------
From:  Nate Williams[SMTP:nate@sri.MT.net]
Sent:  Friday, June 07, 1996 12:05 AM
To:  Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com
Cc:  freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:  Re: Installing FreeBSD-stable

> I see source for FreeBSD-stable, but no binaries.  So, stable is just
> like current, except more stable and less current?  ;-)

Yep.

> What I mean is, you don't have ready-made binary tarballs, and
> ready-to-go installation tools?

Nope.

> Is it a simple matter to just build
> stable sources on a 2.1.0-release system?

Yep.  You update your sources via sup or CTM and then do a 'make world'.
If everything works like it's supposed to you have a system that's 95%
of the way there.  Then, build and install a -stable kernel and you're
98% of the way there.  The remaining 2% is making sure your /etc and
/dev files are merged, but this has to be done by hand right now.


Nate




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?31B86E84>