Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 10:11:39 -0700 From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is Thot (WYSIWIG editor) for you? Message-ID: <3379F24B.934@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> References: <14271.863600208@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > What I am pitching is for is that if Thot is good we can start advertising it > > and hopefully standardize our internal documentation based on its format. > > Internal documentation meaning things like : reports, articles, etc... > > But we already have such a standard and it's called SGML.... SGML is a format, Thot is a toolset and an editor. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I haven't seen a good SGML tool in our ports tree. Thot produces Latex and HTML. AFAIK HTML is a subset of SGML, so I guess Thot fits into the "standard". Anyway I think Amancio is right; we first have to determine if Thot is the right editor for our internal documentation. The searching process will be very fruitful if, like I hope, it translates into ports ! Pedro. > > Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3379F24B.934>