Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:01:01 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: FILEDESC_LOCK() implementation Message-ID: <34009.1150095661@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:59:16 %2B0100." <20060612075515.C26634@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20060612075515.C26634@fledge.watson.org>, Robert Watson writes: >What we probably want is an sx_init_interlock() that allows us to provide the >interlock for an sx lock, wich some variations on sx_*lock() to say we already >hold the interlock. Sounds overly complicated to use. Why not just a sx_xlockfast() sx_xunlockfast() ? for some value of "fast" ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?34009.1150095661>