Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 10:19:14 -0800 From: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org> To: "Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> Cc: David Southwell <david@vizion2000.net>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: [RFC/P] Port System Re-Engineering Message-ID: <34531C67-A2F9-48DB-8161-34593AC0C481@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <47544727.9030209@gmail.com> References: <200712030308.32301.david@vizion2000.net> <3BC04A18-86CD-4A93-831A-691EBD8D4A43@FreeBSD.org> <47543109.3050303@gmail.com> <7957A7E2-3ADA-4BD5-934C-F10A1F08F72F@FreeBSD.org> <47544020.5090605@gmail.com> <ADB6E4A8-DDA2-4C0A-A5E1-EF9A45A53753@FreeBSD.org> <47544727.9030209@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Dec 03, 2007, at 10:12 , Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > I have about 20 responses in private email and only the ones you have > seen in public are in this category Enough said. There are currently ~180 people with direct access to the ports/ tree (ie: ports committers). Even assuming all private email responses came from committers, that's an 11% hit rate. Which part of "statistically invalid" is not getting through here? -aDe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?34531C67-A2F9-48DB-8161-34593AC0C481>