Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 08:31:32 -0600 From: Peter Schultz <pmes@bis.midco.net> To: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Giantless VFS. Message-ID: <3457D9D4-3C93-11D9-BAB4-000D936BE398@bis.midco.net> In-Reply-To: <20041122141552.GC960@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <20041120000743.G18094@mail.chesapeake.net> <41A1C3BD.4010903@fer.hr> <20041122064318.Y18094@mail.chesapeake.net> <20041122141552.GC960@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 22, 2004, at 8:15 AM, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: >> I haven't received any feedback from the list though. I hope people >> are >> testing it. Perhaps the silence indicates universal success? :-) > > Would it be interesting to try your patch on a UP system ? To > anticipate an hypotetical affirmative answer, I'm already recompiling > my > UP kernel with it. > > Reducing contention over the kernel is beneficial for any number of processors. Pete...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3457D9D4-3C93-11D9-BAB4-000D936BE398>