Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 09:31:22 -0700 From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> To: Doug Ledford <dledford@dialnet.net> Cc: "Robert G. Brown" <rgb@phy.duke.edu>, Mail Receiver <rmail@ittc.ukans.edu>, aic7xxx@FreeBSD.ORG, linux-smp@vger.rutgers.edu, linux-tulip@cesdis1.gsfc.nasa.gov Subject: Re: Duration of Blocked Interrupts Message-ID: <3546045A.4A6EB6B7@feral.com> References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980428113454.23254G-100000@ganesh.phy.duke.edu> <3545FDE9.3710DBCD@feral.com> <354603F4.A3218543@dialnet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Ledford wrote: > I did change that in the later versions of my code. For 2.1.x, it is > specifically required that we *don't* enable interrupts during completion > processing. I could put it back for 2.0.x, but it would create a few > questions on my part until I've had time to fully verify everything does > what it's suppossed to do. > > Ah. Well, in 2.1.X you get better kernel threads, no? Maybe a aic7xxx_completion thread? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe aic7xxx" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3546045A.4A6EB6B7>