Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 20:39:49 -0700 From: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> To: Gregory Sutter <gsutter@pobox.com> Cc: "Jason C. Wells" <jcwells@u.washington.edu>, FreeBSD-advocacy <freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Status of Branding Message-ID: <36426F85.A3FCE875@softweyr.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9811042227270.8286-100000@s8-37-26.student.washington.edu> <3641FD2E.B03C4D7E@softweyr.com> <19981105145825.V23039@orcrist.mediacity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gregory Sutter wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 05, 1998 at 12:31:58PM -0700, Wes Peters wrote:
> >
> > I don't think we've achieved quite this level of agreement on the hardware
> > side, but I think the software guidelines are pretty easy to adapt to
> > hardware products. I'm not sure there is any hardware that really
> > qualifies as "Designed for" or "Pure" FreeBSD, so perhaps we only apply
> > the lower logo to hardware?
>
> Whistle InterJet
> ftp.cdrom.com :)
> Nokia VPN200 routing firewall modules
Pluto Space
I'm thinking of a "built with FreeBSD" logo for hw/sw products. Or,
dare I say it, "FreeBSD Inside"?!?!?!
Sound good? bad? perverse?
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
http://www.softweyr.com/~softweyr wes@softweyr.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?36426F85.A3FCE875>