Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 07:54:42 -0800 From: Studded <Studded@gorean.org> To: Allen Smith <easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is 'xntpd' broken in -stable? Message-ID: <369A1EC2.61BEA6E1@gorean.org> References: <199810091927.MAA14061@implode.root.com> <9810241606.ZM2203@beatrice.rutgers.edu> <3632EBD7.717C0B6F@gorean.org> <9901120301.ZM2476@beatrice.rutgers.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Allen Smith wrote:
>
> On Oct 25, 4:14am, Studded (possibly) wrote:
> > Posted this on another list...I disagree with your characterization as
> > much as I'd like to see our version of xntpd updated. The xntpd branch
> > is still maintained and updated, as recently as 4/27/98 for the most
> > recent stable version, and August 10th for the most recent beta.
>
> Well... currently, Dave Mills has stated that they aren't maintaining
> xntpd any longer; any updates are through patches they've accepted,
> but have not necessarily done testing on.
Let's put it this way. Their version of xntpd is much better supported
than ours is. :)
ntpd-4.0.91 appears
> sufficiently stable that they're going to make it into ntpd-4.1 and an
> official 'release' pretty soon.
Well it's too late to do anything with 2.2-Stable. Therefore
contrib'ifying the release of ntpd for 3.something would be the way to
go at this point.
Doug
--
*** Chief Operations Officer, DALnet IRC network ***
Like desperadoes waiting for a train . . .
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?369A1EC2.61BEA6E1>