Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 10:09:59 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> Cc: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com>, Adam Turoff <aturoff@isinet.com>, freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bsd vs. linux and NT chart Message-ID: <36DC8BE7.246DD3BA@newsguy.com> References: <99Mar2.114516est.113920@pandora.isinet.com> <4.1.19990302132445.040f6d40@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brett Glass wrote: > > Well, as I understand it, FreeBSD 3.x is still not what's > recommended for production applications. (I'm installing 2.2.8 on > all of the productions machines I bring up.) So does this count? 3.1-RELEASE/3.1-STABLE is what is recommended for new installations on production machines. 2.2.x, right now, is probably kind of how you feel about 2.1.x. :-) -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "FreeBSD is Yoda, Linux is Luke Skywalker." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?36DC8BE7.246DD3BA>