Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 17:20:56 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: alk@pobox.com Cc: phk@critter.freebsd.dk, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: swap-related problems Message-ID: <3715A168.B193834E@newsguy.com> References: <14100.61923.427423.153188@avalon.east> <1892.924120059@critter.freebsd.dk> <14100.62842.127882.239452@avalon.east>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Anthony Kimball wrote: > > Quoth Poul-Henning Kamp on Wed, 14 April: > : > : 1. Demonstrate the need. > > Well, it's only needed if you want to be able to reliably execute ANSI > C code according to spec. I personally don't care. I'd be surprised > if core didn't though. I would suspect that it would be deemed worthy > of someone's p2 queue, at least. FreeBSD executes ANSI C code reliably according to spec, as long as there is enough memory in the system. If there isn't, FreeBSD doesn't run reliably, much less executes any kind of code reliably. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "Well, Windows works, using a loose definition of 'works'..." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3715A168.B193834E>