Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 01:16:32 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd64 TLS implementation Message-ID: <37304031@bsam.ru> In-Reply-To: <20060929150435.GA27118@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> (Divacky Roman's message of "Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:04:35 %2B0200") References: <20060929150435.GA27118@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Roman! Glad to hear you. ;-) On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:04:35 +0200 Divacky Roman wrote: > this http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xdivac02/amd64-tls.patch is yet another > attempt to do TLS on amd64. This time I am quite hopefull it might work. > I dont have amd64 system at hand so pls test: > 1) build kernel with this patch Two new files from the patch (linux_aio.c and linux_aio.h) should be at a separate patch. And seems that if_em.c stuff doesn't belong to your patch. The kernel builds fine. > 2) sysctl compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.16 > 3) chroot /compat/linux /bin/bash And here we get core dumpted. > pls report me what happened (desired behaviour is to get bash prompt) Well, but your patches may be good but it's another bug (well known, which always lead to bash core dumps). Thanks! WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37304031>