Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 01 Jul 1999 11:27:49 +0200
From:      Palle Girgensohn <girgen@partitur.se>
To:        Yarema <yds@ingress.net>
Cc:        Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp>, Ports Team <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: mod_jserv for apache
Message-ID:  <377B3495.5277653B@partitur.se>
References:  <37758822.C4BEC2D@sky.rim.or.jp> <3776A5B5.CA6E9DBF@partitur.se> <00c001bec320$75c44780$1f40e6cd@ingress.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Great. I agree. And as IO said, that's how NetBSD does, so if conformal
with the NetBSD ports collection as well.

/Palle

Yarema wrote:
> 
> From: Palle Girgensohn <girgen@partitur.se>
> > Jun Kuriyama wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm ready to import a port of jserv DSO for apache.  This port doesn't
> > > include apache core modules, only jserv's DSO and documents.
> > >
> > > What should we choose PKGNAME for it?
> >
> >
> > NetBSD has had DSO ports for some time, and they use ap-xxx, alas
> > ap-jserv in this case. But. NetBSD is traditionally less verbose. How
> > about 'apache-jserv'. I know that there is work going on to move most of
> > the apache modules to dso, so this will not confuse in the long run.
> 
> I think 'apache-jserv' might be confused with 'apache13-mod_ssl' and the
> like, which are fullblown apache installations not just DSO modules. Since
> perl modules use p5- and python modules use py- I think using ap- for apache
> modules would be more consistent.
> 
> --
> Yarema


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?377B3495.5277653B>