Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 10:13:26 -0700 From: "Naseem A. Choudhury" <naseem@ironport.com> To: "Mike Jakubik" <mikej@rogers.com>, <jpeg@thilelli.net> Cc: John Pettitt <jpp@cloudview.com>, stable@freebsd.org, Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de> Subject: Re: Good, stable gigabit nic? Message-ID: <37EA3DB9B5B98C44A325E9DB561856E86343B4@vader.ironportsystems.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
We have had problems with BGE, but have had good luck with intel FXP and = EMO, but they are expensive. -naseem -----Original Message----- From: Mike Jakubik [mailto:mikej@rogers.com] Sent: Sat Oct 08 08:31:46 2005 To: jpeg@thilelli.net Cc: John Pettitt; stable@freebsd.org; Markus Trippelsdorf Subject: Re: Good, stable gigabit nic? On Sat, October 8, 2005 7:43 am, Julien Gabel wrote: >>> My gigabit nic has gone bad (after months of working just fine it's >>> saying "sk0 watchdog timeout" after a day or so of operation - temp = fix >>> is to reboot) - I'm looking for pointers for a low cos but = functional >>> gigabit PCI 32 card that runs under 5.4 without issues. What works = for >>> you? The Intel gigabit cards are quite good, 'man em' for details. As a = second choice, i would look in to a Broadcom based card, 'man bge' for that = one. _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37EA3DB9B5B98C44A325E9DB561856E86343B4>