Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 20 Mar 2000 11:48:02 +0100
From:      "Jose M. Alcaide" <jose@we.lc.ehu.es>
To:        obrien@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc:        Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: suggestion: a g77 -> f77 link
Message-ID:  <38D601E2.268BEB2B@we.lc.ehu.es>
References:  <38CD1091.94E73AC9@we.lc.ehu.es> <20000314143826.D9311@dragon.nuxi.com> <vqcog8h9f3q.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi David,

Now, a week after the discussion, what do you think about my proposal
of the "g77" link under /usr/bin? IMHO, the following facts are all good
reasons for creating the link:

  - the output of "f77 -V", "f77 --version", "man f77", and "info g77";
  - our Fortran compiler _is_ GNU Fortran, i.e., g77;
  - there are configure scripts which [legitimately] look for g77 when
    instructed to use the GNU Fortran compiler;
  - we already have a "gcc" link.

I understand (and agree) your arguments against Gfoo, but I think that
the benefits of the g77 link are worth the "sacrifice" (gsacrifice?) :-)

Regards,
-- JMA

 ***** Jose M. Alcaide // jose@we.lc.ehu.es // jmas@FreeBSD.org *****
 "Beware of Programmers who carry screwdrivers" --  Leonard Brandwein


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38D601E2.268BEB2B>