Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 10:55:36 -0400 (EDT) From: matt@gsicomp.on.ca To: "David Gilbert" <dgilbert@dclg.ca> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: On the use of Tun interfaces. Message-ID: <3902.192.168.0.1.1153234536.squirrel@webmail.gsicomp.on.ca> In-Reply-To: <17596.26134.831813.158138@canoe.dclg.ca> References: <17596.26134.831813.158138@canoe.dclg.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The man pages of if_tun are out-of-date in some respects, but with > comments from the group and reading the sources of ppp, I have worked > around most of the problems I've found. However, I'm stuck with one > quandry. My tunnel setup process produces the following: > > tun0: flags=8051<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet6 fe80::214:22ff:fede:f175%tun0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 > inet 192.168.12.2 --> 192.168.22.1 netmask 0xffffffff > Opened by PID 86506 > > but then I ask: > > [3:14:314]dgilbert@canoe:~/devel/failsafe> route get 192.168.22.1 > route to: 192.168.22.1 > destination: default > mask: default > gateway: strike1 > interface: bge0 > > and indeed: > > [3:15:315]dgilbert@canoe:~/devel/failsafe> netstat -rn > Routing tables > > Internet: > Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire > default xx.yy.zz.33 UGS 0 1629642 bge0 > xx.yy.zz.32/27 link#1 UC 0 0 bge0 > xx.yy.zz.33 00:80:c8:c9:22:31 UHLW 2 16 bge0 1046 > 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 4111852 lo0 > 192.168.22.1 192.168.12.2 UH 0 0 tun0 > > shouldn't the last route there be active? Any clues here? Have you set net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 via sysctl? -- Matt Emmerton
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3902.192.168.0.1.1153234536.squirrel>