Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 25 Sep 2020 01:38:30 +0200
From:      Klaus Cucinauomo <maciphone2@googlemail.com>
To:        Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: head -r365677 and later do not have the xhci related DMA problem fixed
Message-ID:  <39346C6E-CF29-42E8-BCAB-B04E73F909F7@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <231B8A1B-7F61-4868-B9E6-F8DD824079CA@yahoo.com>
References:  <5A60B29E-0D24-480C-807D-4A5E92D9C92A.ref@yahoo.com> <5A60B29E-0D24-480C-807D-4A5E92D9C92A@yahoo.com> <CCC44A9E-68C0-4EEF-AA68-AFA2F1F93ADA@googlemail.com> <JTSsaCfyfQICpQuYOx_aY-35TQTxCtQbI3L_t1o70kdtk-MZrrJ06WuluBwhYS5BQ58Apdet1XTP3u79WZYGUj8L2BjY_owAkoVLMN8IXVU=@protonmail.com> <231B8A1B-7F61-4868-B9E6-F8DD824079CA@yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


> Am 25.09.2020 um 00:41 schrieb Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>:
>=20
> So, should I figure out the currently proper way to have a
> u-boot based boot environment and try the huge-file duplicate
> and diff/cmp test in such an environment?

you will be shocked how many issues in fdt are meanwhile fixed by the =
=E2=80=9Aghostwriter`(Sponsored by: Innovate UK)  :-).
see the Wiki-list of features/what works.
I didn`t test the huge-file-thing extensively
 but when our `other U.K-innovator`:-)  says he has fixed it in D26344 =
that means:
It IS definitely fixed. :-)...  but of course you should continue =
attacking the board because=20
you mostly find out something interesting ;-)=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39346C6E-CF29-42E8-BCAB-B04E73F909F7>