Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 21:15:25 +0100 (CET) From: "Benjamin Thelen" <bt@ccgis.de> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: openoffice-2 & openssl-beta-0.9.8a Message-ID: <39809.192.168.0.5.1134159325.squirrel@192.168.0.5>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
You FreeBSD guys, This is a kind of reposting, I got no response to this question (Why? Is there something wrong how I write my my question(s)?), whether list (archives) nor google told me something _really_ helpful - just stupid work arounds -sorry. I suppose there are many of you using the OpenOffice-2.0 package from http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/ which requires openssl-beta-0.9.8a to be installed (I don't understand why). Installing openssl-beta from ports at first doesn't hurt. But at the stage of portupgrading next time it starts to be a pain, so I end up removing openoffice-2 and openssl-beta _before_ I do a portupgrade. If I don't remove both ports, any port that requires openssl is built with openssl-beta instead of openssl from the base system. If I add WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes, which seemd to be a good solution, net-snmp (required for kdeutils) complains that it cannot build if there is a newer openssl version installed by a port. There we are again, byebye openssl-beta/openoffice, portupgrade, reinstall both. I'm a bit of a loss, no answer, no help by google, but I can't be the only one who faces this problem. How are you dealing with this? Do I overlook something? Thanks, Ben
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39809.192.168.0.5.1134159325.squirrel>