Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 16:52:24 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@cup.hp.com> To: Marc Evans <marc@destek.net> Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: WebTrends on FreeBSD 4.1 (Linux Emulation) Message-ID: <3988B438.F4ADB5F7@cup.hp.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0008021916110.55154-100000@ns2.destek.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Marc Evans wrote: > > /kernel: linux: syscall rt_sigtimedwait is obsoleted or not implemented > > I have done some searches on the prior e-mail on the lists and I am not > finding any discussion about 1) Is there a good workaround? 2) What was > the basis of decision resulting in some syscalls not being implemented? 1) Implementing the syscall is the best "workaround" :-) 2) This is not so much a decision. So far nothing depended on the syscall. Implementation of syscalls is primarily based on available time and how often Linux binaries fail because it isnt implemented. > I am considering trying to implement the function, but if there is already > a good workaround then please let me know. Also, if there is good reason > not to bother trying to implement this, I would really appreciate > knowing... I think that implementing the syscall is the best approach. -- Marcel Moolenaar mail: marcel@cup.hp.com / marcel@FreeBSD.org tel: (408) 447-4222 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3988B438.F4ADB5F7>