Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 19:54:21 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com> To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What replaces csup? Message-ID: <39B0E74E2DF04033DE7D0080@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local> In-Reply-To: <20567.50041.903201.979498@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <D97788AE24B7FFB0C79AA6FB@localhost> <k38bct$ang$1@ger.gmane.org> <780066C6E2FAB67A997876B7@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local> <20567.50041.903201.979498@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--On September 17, 2012 8:42:33 PM -0400 Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> wrote: > > Paul Schmehl writes: > >> Does csup use subversion now? Or do we need to use something >> else to fetch source? > > As I understand it, for the average user c(vs)up and subversion > serve the same function using different methods (both in terms of > identifying what files need to be fetched and actually fetching > them). At this level of discussion they are mutually exclusive. > I have switched from csup to subversion for ports and docs. > After modest preparation it was essentially painless. > Are these modest preparations documented somewhere? Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ******************************************* "It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use of reason as to administer medication to the dead." Thomas Jefferson "There are some ideas so wrong that only a very intelligent person could believe in them." George Orwell
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39B0E74E2DF04033DE7D0080>