Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 21:00:00 -0500 From: Sergey Babkin <babkin@bellatlantic.net> To: Dennis <dennis@etinc.com> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Message-ID: <3A4012A0.44B4CEED@bellatlantic.net> References: <Your message of "Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:43:17 EST." <5.0.0.25.0.20001219111044.020739e0@mail.etinc.com> <5.0.0.25.0.20001219120619.020cbac0@mail.etinc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dennis wrote: > > I didnt "praise" closed source. I said there is arguable reasoning behind > preferring supported binary drivers that work over incomplete source > drivers. Selecting an OS based solely on this criteria is just plain > stupid. Drivers generally do not require changes unless they are buggy. And And buggy they usually are. In some cases it's just unbelievable what kinds of morons write these drivers (if you want an example, look for the company named "Longshine"). > We have a saying in the US. "communism failed because its very essence > breeds mediocrity". Your inabiltity to understand a business model that > includes protecting corporate-funded assets, when MOST of the world's > corporations adhere exclusively to such a model, shows how little you know > about business in general. The drivers are _not_ assets. When I buy a piece of hardware I very reasonably expect that it would come with drivers or at least the manual on how to write these. It's a part of the deal. There are absolutely no reasons for the card manufacturers to withhold this information, their hardware is their copyright protection device and source of profit. -SB To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A4012A0.44B4CEED>