Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 17:17:02 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: dmaddox@sc.rr.com Cc: Graham Wheeler <gram@cequrux.com>, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Just how standard is APM? Message-ID: <3A5582FE.767A617D@newsguy.com> References: <3A545615.3597BCF3@cequrux.com> <200101042234.f04MYM147333@harmony.village.org> <3A556040.6B9163BB@cequrux.com> <20010105024436.A2700@cae88-102-101.sc.rr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Donald J . Maddox" wrote: > > Yeah, I thought that APM was APM, but the apm device does nothing > on my desktop with power management hardware... That is, things like > 'shutdown -p now' don't work, both 'apm' and 'apmd' just return > 'device not configured', etc. Interestingly, at least 'shutdown -p' > does work with ACPI anyway :) Of course, maybe I'm just misunder- > standing the whole thing anyway... Is power management hardware > == APM? If this is still about the Presario laptop, APM works (or did up to november) on the Compaq Presario 1621. Note the apm and acpi can't be used together in the same kernel. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org capo@the.great.underground.bsdconpiracy.org "The bronze landed last, which canceled that method of impartial choice." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A5582FE.767A617D>