Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:48:37 +0200 From: Joachim =?iso-8859-1?Q?Str=F6mbergson?= <watchman@ludd.luth.se> To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Benny Prijono <seventhson@theseventhson.freeserve.co.uk>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gcc 2.95.3 and STL Message-ID: <3AC24E25.9207EDF6@ludd.luth.se> References: <3AC1A050.62BE0194@pop3.NL.net> <20010328010123.A40915@dragon.nuxi.com> <3AC1B2C1.8BE22BD1@theseventhson.freeserve.co.uk> <20010328121539.A83100@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Aloha! David O'Brien wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 10:45:37AM +0100, Benny Prijono wrote: > > the March 2001 edition of C++ Users Journal (http://www.cuj.com) has > > surveys on comformance level of each C++ compiler and STL > > implementation. You may want to take a look at it. > > I didn't see the article on-line, so I'll have to try my local Borders. Just to be nitpicking (and to prove that my glasses works sometimes), there is an article that deals with conformance in different compilers at the site: http://www.cuj.com/roundup/a.htm Fast-browsing it seems that conformance visavi STL is not the main focus of this article. It doeas talk about a STL roundup though. -- Cheers! Joachim - Alltid i harmonisk svängning --- FairLight ------ FairLight ------ FairLight ------ FairLight --- Joachim Strömbergson ASIC SoC designer, nice to CUTE animals Phone: +46(0)31 - 27 98 47 Web: http://www.ludd.luth.se/~watchman --------------- Spamfodder: regeringen@regeringen.se --------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3AC24E25.9207EDF6>