Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 00:55:24 -0700 From: W Gerald Hicks <gehicks@cisco.com> To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why is the STABLE branch not so stable anymore? Message-ID: <3B25CAEC.27AF9D30@cisco.com> References: <Pine.A41.3.96.1010612000229.84080E-100000@gsaix2.cc.GaSoU.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Scott Dodson wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Mike Smith wrote: > > > The sky isn't falling, ok? If you want to help improve the stability of > > -stable, the right way is to get involved in the feedback process. > > > > Is this not what's being done with threads such as this? > > -- > scott <RANT> No. Threads like this are completely wasting the time of people who use it for its chartered purposes. The feedback process is centered on the proper use of send-pr. Truth is, this thread is a pulverised mass of dead horse flesh that has been beat for years by people expecting a free operating system to conform to some mental model they have formed in absence of what has actually been communicated by the project. Cripes people, the CVS repository is available for people to be able to slide back and forth in time as necessary. It only requires a tiny bit of competence. For fair effort on your part you also gain a fair amount of liberty along with a system that has literally made computing history in terms of stability. On top of that, it's free. </RANT> Can this stupid thread please die now? Jerry Hicks gehicks@cisco.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B25CAEC.27AF9D30>