Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 22:45:38 -0600 From: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> To: obrien@FreeBSD.org Cc: Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>, arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: nvi maintainer? Message-ID: <3B4936F2.72D7C1C7@softweyr.com> References: <200107072203.PAA09299@windsor.research.att.com> <xzp3d88s3o0.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20010708005155.J8775@canonware.com> <20010708032002.D97456@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> <20010708201329.A85258@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David O'Brien wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 03:20:02AM -0500, Will Andrews wrote:
> > OR... import Vim and get rid of nvi? :-)
> ..snip..
> > The maintainer reserves the right to include any changes in the official
> > version of Vim. This is negotiable. You are not allowed to distribute a
> > modified version of Vim when you are not willing to make the source code
> > available to the maintainer.
>
> Uh... did you read this part __carefully__??
I don't see a problem there. It's not like we're going to hide the source
to FreeBSD from the vim maintainer. OTOH, I don't really think we need
a "better" vi bad enough to lump in vim.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
wes@softweyr.com http://softweyr.com/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B4936F2.72D7C1C7>