Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 09:06:36 +0100 From: "Patrick M. Hausen" <hausen@punkt.de> To: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> Cc: Pete French <petefrench@ingresso.co.uk>, FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Binary update to -STABLE? And if so, what do I get? Message-ID: <3B4C0FF6-32C2-4DBB-BE5B-8C5F2EB59430@punkt.de> In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1sv-a6q3KfAMhZ00zo8kY2Mkk8f3=F6P3OZC926x%2BrbSA@mail.gmail.com> References: <80937c57-7757-3c70-5198-4da12c4f23d9@denninger.net> <20190213134939.GO2748@home.opsec.eu> <29563d3e-608d-591e-89bb-bf428b52bdc8@denninger.net> <CACLnyCJByvrahyk1MBdckRxpXw3-GVXDM5WMMTUUmaJRffdqmg@mail.gmail.com> <1656e7f5-ef76-55d8-f46c-416223c5f975@ingresso.co.uk> <CAN6yY1sv-a6q3KfAMhZ00zo8kY2Mkk8f3=F6P3OZC926x%2BrbSA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Good morning, > Am 14.02.2019 um 19:11 schrieb Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com>: > Far and away the biggest is the requirement to build from sources. = It's not > a big deal for me, but if I still had many systems to deal with, that = would > be a pain. > [=E2=80=A6] > The bottom line is that the only real reasons I see for not running = stable > is the lack of binary updates, and issues with systems being slightly = out > of sync if all are not updated to the same SVN revision at all times. = Those > are very big reasons for many. We build from sources centrally, then zfs send/receive /usr/src and /usr/obj to all of the machines, then just do the install(kernel|world) part on all of them. Kind regards Patrick --=20 punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung Kaiserallee 13a Tel.: 0721 9109-0 Fax: -100 76133 Karlsruhe info@punkt.de http://punkt.de AG Mannheim 108285 Gf: Juergen Egeling
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B4C0FF6-32C2-4DBB-BE5B-8C5F2EB59430>