Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 21:20:35 +0200 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>, Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com>, jdp@FreeBSD.org, deischen@FreeBSD.org, jasone@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org, jlemon@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Linking libc before libc_r into application causes weird problems Message-ID: <3C642503.168DDF93@FreeBSD.org> References: <1013147180.73417.2.camel@notebook> <20020207234233.D23162@canonware.com> <3C639A8C.6D100326@FreeBSD.org> <3C63A62D.3E4A4FC4@mindspring.com> <3C63AD02.79BA5AF5@FreeBSD.org> <20020208164132.D78163@sunbay.com> <3C63E5D1.1E423698@FreeBSD.org> <3C63E961.45706408@mindspring.com> <20020208172503.H78163@sunbay.com> <3C63F3FE.D4E73334@FreeBSD.org> <3C6410A6.495CFD3A@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert wrote: > > Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > But no library has it here! libc comes out of blue just before libc_r > > - see attached script. Perhaps I'm missing something, but I can't > > figure out where it comes from, could you? > > What does your patched ldd say about each and every one > of those .so's you are linking in perhaps being linked > against libc.so, or linked against something linked > against something ... linked against something linked > against libc.so? It reports the full chain, so that when A.so depends on B.so, while B.so depends on C.so, but A.so doesn't explicitly depend on C.so, `ldd A.so' will show both B.so and C.so. > Are *any* of the object files created with "ld -r"? I don't think so. > Which binutils are you using? $ ld -v GNU ld version 2.11.2 20010719 [FreeBSD] (with BFD 2.11.2 20010719 [FreeBSD]) -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C642503.168DDF93>