Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 23:08:46 +0200 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: "Georg-W. Koltermann" <Georg.Koltermann@mscsoftware.com> Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fsck hosed? Message-ID: <3D29FF5E.6040307@gmx.net> References: <20020708044114.22412380A@overcee.wemm.org> <1026136245.61276.58.camel@hunter.muc.macsch.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Georg-W. Koltermann wrote: > Yes, I see that as well. Another symptom is that fsck -p now always > announces "unexpected inconsistencies" and drops back to singleuser when > it indeed was able to fix the problems, i.e. it marks the filesystem > clean and a manual fsck does not report anything unusual. Metoo: I have fsck_y_enable="YES" set and sometimes it'd announce "unexpected inconsistencies", sometimes it'd not, but it will always bail out to single user after it processes the first unclean filessystem. I then need to run fsck as many times as I have dirty filesystems (because it'll exit after it has cleaned one of them). Regards, -- Michael Nottebrock "The circumstance ends uglily in the cruel result." - Babelfish [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE9Kf9jXhc68WspdLARApxeAJwK+ZOjXqWs2b1VDa1ZUfE64q4iDgCfTEvR SHSNOJP7QGLVMFzKPvfq40k= =uWed -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3D29FF5E.6040307>